SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Tammy A. Thames

Last decided Dallas DowntownJul 2026
Decisions 3,845since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing Judge Thames to the broader bench provides context for your hearing. While her 70% approval rate since 2016 sits within the 21% to 76% range of her peers at the Dallas Downtown office, recent data shows a 76% approval rate in the latest reporting period. This latest-period figure is 18 percentage points higher than the office average of 58%. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 70%
Decisions on record 3,845
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Thames Dallas Downtown National
Approval rate 76% 58% 58%
Fully favorable 68% — —
Denials 24% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Thames's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Thames
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Judge Thames has issued 3,845 decisions with a generally consistent approval pattern. While the rate fluctuated between 60% and 78% over the years, the recent trend shows stability, with the latest-period approval rate of 76% aligning with her performance in 2025. This recent activity reflects a continuation of a pattern where the judge's approval rate remains notably above the local and national averages.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Thames's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Dallas Downtown hearing office

The Dallas Downtown hearing office serves you and other claimants across Texas. With 18 judges whose most recent office on record is this location, the office maintains an average approval rate of 58% in the latest reporting period. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on your medical evidence and vocational testimony.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Dallas Downtown

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 18 judges whose most recent office on record is the Dallas Downtown office. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 21% to 76% on their records since 2016. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions