SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Antony Saragas

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 3,164 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. While Antony Saragas maintains a 50% lifetime approval rate, his latest-period performance shows a 50% approval rate, which aligns exactly with the Lexington office's latest-period average. These figures are drawn from a record of 3,164 lifetime decisions, providing a clear view of his historical decision-making. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 50%
Decisions on record 3,164
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Saragas Lexington National
Approval rate 50% 50% 58%
Fully favorable 42%
Denials 50%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Saragas's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Saragas
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The record for Antony Saragas begins in 2016 and shows a varied yearly trend. After an approval rate of 62% in 2017, the figures fluctuated over the following years before settling into the current 50% rate observed in the most recent reporting period. This pattern reflects the consistent application of SSA standards over 3,164 total decisions. The latest period reflects a continuation of this steady pattern, showing that the judge's approach remains consistent with his recent historical average.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Saragas's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Lexington hearing office

The Lexington hearing office serves you throughout Kentucky and the surrounding region. With 18 judges on record, the office maintains a steady volume of disability hearings. The office-wide latest-period approval rate is 50%, providing a benchmark for the local judicial environment. You can see the Lexington Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

SSA assigns cases to judges using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. The Lexington office bench is composed of 18 judges on record since 2016, 10 of whom reported data in the latest period. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 21% to 79% on lifetime records. Preparation guidance remains consistent regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions