SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Romona Scales

Last decided Valparaiso INJul 2026
Decisions 2,190since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes to ensure the data is meaningful. While your judge's overall approval rate since 2016 is 47%, recent performance shows a 52% approval rate in the latest reporting period. This is 4 points lower than the 56% approval rate for the Valparaiso IN office during the same period. These figures are based on a volume of 2,190 decisions on record since 2016.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 47%
Decisions on record 2,190
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Scales Valparaiso IN National
Approval rate 52% 56% 58%
Fully favorable 38% — —
Denials 48% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Scales's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Scales
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Romona Scales has fluctuated across the 2,190 decisions on record since 2016. After a period of lower approval rates between 2018 and 2023, the data shows a shift in 2024 and 2025. The latest reporting period shows an approval rate of 52%, which indicates a divergence from the long-term average.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Scales's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Valparaiso IN hearing office

The most recent office on record for Romona Scales is the Valparaiso IN hearing office, with the last recorded decision there in July 2026. With 11 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, the office maintains a latest-period approval rate of 56%. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on your medical and vocational evidence.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Valparaiso IN

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 11 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with 6 of them having decided cases in the latest file from July 2026. Approval rates for this bench range from 42% to 83% based on records since 2016.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions