SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Leeanne Foster

Last decided Valparaiso INJul 2026
Decisions 3,992since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Over the 12 months to July 31, 2026, Leeanne Foster's 63% approval rate sits above the 56% office average, the 60% state average, and the 58% national average. These figures are based on 445 decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predicting the outcome of your specific hearing.

Last 12 months July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Foster Valparaiso IN National
Approval rate 63% 56% 58%
Fully favorable 51% — —
Denials 37% — —
Decisions 445 — —
All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 60%
Decisions on record 3,992

SSA publishes no office- or national-level breakdown of fully favorable and denial rates. The 12 months are SSA's figures for this fiscal year to date plus the rest of the previous fiscal year; how we calculate them.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Foster's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Foster
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Leeanne Foster has issued 3,992 decisions on record. The yearly approval rate has fluctuated, reaching 63% in the most recent partial year of 2026. This record includes a period where the rate moved between 55% and 67% over the last several years. The most recent 12-month window shows a 63% approval rate, compared to the 60% approval rate recorded across the entire period since 2016.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Foster's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Valparaiso IN hearing office

The Valparaiso IN Hearing Office is the most recent office on record for Leeanne Foster as of July 2026. This office maintains a bench of 11 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. Claimants at this office saw an average approval rate of 56% over the 12 months to July 31, 2026.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Valparaiso IN

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Among the 11 judges whose most recent office on record is Valparaiso IN, 6 judges decided cases here in SSA's latest file. These 6 judges range from 46% to 63% in their approval rates over the 12 months to July 31, 2026.

Judges with similar approval rates

These active judges' approval rates over the same 12 months (July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026) are closest to Judge Foster's 63%. All five last decided cases in Indiana.

Rates within 5 points of each other are hard to tell apart at a typical caseload, so treat these as judges with comparable records, not a ranking. See Judge Foster and the three closest side by side →

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions