SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Jeanette Schrand

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Valparaiso IN Hearing Office · 6 years on the bench · 8,211 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Schrand?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's approval rate to broader benchmarks provides context for your hearing. Judge Schrand maintains a lifetime approval rate of 41% across 8,211 lifetime decisions. This figure is evaluated against the latest office, state, and national averages, which are 58%, 59%, and 58% respectively. These metrics are derived from a significant volume of cases, offering a stable view of historical trends.

Metric Judge Schrand Valparaiso IN National
Approval rate 41% 58% 58%
Fully favorable 35%
Denials 59%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Schrand's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Schrand
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY18FY22
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over her 6 years on the bench, Judge Schrand has presided over 8,211 lifetime decisions. Her annual approval rates have shown fluctuation, beginning with a 51% approval rate in 2018 before shifting to 36% in 2019, 43% in 2020, 48% in 2021, and 28% in 2022. These variations reflect changes in case complexity or evidentiary standards over your judge's tenure.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Schrand's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Schrand? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Valparaiso IN hearing office

The Valparaiso IN Hearing Office serves you and other claimants throughout the region, managing a diverse caseload of disability applications. The office currently maintains an average approval rate of 58%. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on your medical evidence and vocational testimony. For more information, visit the Valparaiso IN Hearing Office page.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. Within the Valparaiso IN Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the 6 ALJs range from 41% to 65%. While these differences exist, the fundamental requirements for proving your disability remain consistent across all courtrooms.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions