SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Robert R. Schriver

Last decided QueensJul 2026
Decisions 2,572since 2017

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes to ensure accuracy. While you see a 65% approval rate on record since 2017, the latest-period data shows a 72% approval rate, which sits 4 points below the 76% office average for the same period. These figures are derived from a significant volume of 2,572 decisions, providing a stable baseline for analysis. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2017
Approval rate 65%
Decisions on record 2,572
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Schriver Queens National
Approval rate 72% 76% 58%
Fully favorable 58% — —
Denials 28% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Schriver's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Schriver
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY18FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval trend for Robert R. Schriver shows notable movement across the 2,572 decisions on record since December 2017. After a period of lower approval rates between 2019 and 2021, you can see a distinct rise in favorable outcomes starting in 2022 and 2023. While the 2026 fiscal year-to-date rate of 72% remains strong, it reflects a slight shift from the 77% peak observed in 2025. This recent pattern suggests a period of relative stability following the earlier fluctuations in case outcomes.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Schriver's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Queens hearing office

The most recent office on record for Robert R. Schriver is the Queens hearing office, which serves the New York region. This office hosts a bench of 11 judges who manage a high volume of disability claims. The office-wide approval rate in the latest reporting period is 76%, reflecting the broader environment in which your hearing occurs.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Queens

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 11 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with 6 of them having decided cases in the latest file through July 2026. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 49% to 85% on their records since 2016. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions