SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Kathleen Scully-Hayes

Last decided St Petersburg Fl OHOJul 2026
Decisions 2,020since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

This table compares the approval rate of Kathleen Scully-Hayes against the broader bench at the St Petersburg FL OHO. We look at the judge's since-2016 record of 2,020 decisions against the office's bench range of 35% to 85%. Additionally, we examine the most recent reporting period to see how the judge's latest performance aligns with regional and national averages.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 69%
Decisions on record 2,020
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Scully-Hayes St Petersburg Fl OHO National
Approval rate 100% 63% 58%
Fully favorable 100% — —
Denials 0% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Scully-Hayes's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Scully-Hayes
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the approval rate for Kathleen Scully-Hayes has moved from 74% in 2016 to a peak of 78% in 2023. With 2,020 total decisions on record, the data provides a clear view of how the judge has approached cases over the last decade. While the latest reporting period shows a 100% approval rate across 3 decisions, this partial data serves as a snapshot rather than a long-term shift.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Scully-Hayes's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the St Petersburg Fl OHO hearing office

Kathleen Scully-Hayes's most recent office on record is the St Petersburg FL OHO, with decisions there through July 2026. This office serves the Florida region and maintains a bench of 17 judges. You can expect a standard hearing process where evidence quality remains the primary factor in your outcome.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is St Petersburg Fl OHO

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 17 judges whose most recent office on record is the St Petersburg FL OHO, with 5 of them deciding cases in the latest file from July 2026. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 35% to 85% since 2016.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions