SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Barbara Sheehe

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 106 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Understanding how your judge compares to the broader bench is a vital step in preparing for your hearing. At the Akron OH hearing office, lifetime approval rates across the bench vary significantly, ranging from 43% to 80%. This variance highlights why your specific case evidence remains the most important factor in your outcome. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 52%
Decisions on record 106

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Sheehe. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 30, 2016. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Sheehe's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Sheehe
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Barbara Sheehe has a record of 106 lifetime decisions starting from 2016. Her approval rate has remained steady at 52% throughout this period. Because your record reflects a consistent approach to evaluating disability claims, you can focus your preparation on ensuring your medical evidence clearly meets Social Security Administration criteria. This steady pattern suggests that the judge maintains a stable standard for evaluating your functional limitations.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Sheehe's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Akron OH hearing office

The Akron OH hearing office serves claimants throughout the region, maintaining a bench of 13 judges on record. This office operates within the broader SSDI framework, where the latest-period approval rate for the office stands at 53%. You can expect a formal hearing process focused on your medical documentation and vocational testimony. You can see the Akron OH Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 13 judges on record at this office since 2016, 7 of whom reported in the latest period. With approval rates across the office ranging from 43% to 80%, it is common for you to wonder how your assigned judge compares to others. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions