SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Jonathan T. Shoenholz

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2018
Decisions 3,054 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's record requires looking at consistent data periods. While Jonathan T. Shoenholz maintains a 66% lifetime approval rate, his most recent reporting period shows a 70% approval rate. This latest figure sits 8 points above the Columbia SC office average of 62%, 10 points above the state average, and 12 points above the national average.

Lifetime SSA records since 2018
Approval rate 66%
Decisions on record 3,054
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Shoenholz Columbia SC National
Approval rate 70% 62% 58%
Fully favorable 60%
Denials 30%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Shoenholz's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Shoenholz
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY18FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

The decision record for Jonathan T. Shoenholz, spanning from 2018 to 2026, shows a fluctuating but generally consistent approval trend. After starting at 73% in 2018, the rate saw a period of decline before rebounding to 70% in the most recent reporting period. With 3,054 total decisions on record, the data suggests that while yearly outcomes vary, the judge maintains a steady approach to evaluating your disability claim.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Shoenholz's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Columbia SC hearing office

The Columbia SC hearing office serves you and other claimants throughout the region, managing a diverse caseload of SSDI applications. With 11 judges on record, the office maintains an average latest-period approval rate of 62%. You can expect a standard administrative hearing process focused on your medical evidence and vocational testimony. You can see the Columbia SC Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. The Columbia SC bench includes 11 judges on record since 2016, 6 of whom are reported in the latest SSA data. These judges show a wide range of lifetime approval rates, spanning from 50% to 76%.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions