SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Jonathan T. Shoenholz

Last decided Columbia SCJul 2026
Decisions 3,054since 2018

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing the approval rate of Jonathan T. Shoenholz to the broader bench provides context for how cases are handled in the Columbia SC office. While his 66% approval rate since 2018 sits within the 50% to 81% range observed among his peers at this office, recent data shows his latest-period approval rate of 70% is 8 points higher than the office average of 62%. These figures are based on a significant volume of decisions, providing a stable statistical foundation.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2018
Approval rate 66%
Decisions on record 3,054
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Shoenholz Columbia SC National
Approval rate 70% 62% 58%
Fully favorable 60% — —
Denials 30% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Shoenholz's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Shoenholz
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY18FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since January 2018, the approval rate for Jonathan T. Shoenholz has shown a varied trend. After an initial 73% approval rate in 2018, the figures fluctuated, dipping to 61% in 2025 before rising to 70% in the partial 2026 fiscal year. With 3,054 total decisions on record, this pattern demonstrates that the approach to evidence and case requirements has evolved over time. The recent uptick in the latest period reflects a departure from the lower rates seen in the preceding year.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Shoenholz's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Columbia SC hearing office

The Columbia SC hearing office serves you throughout South Carolina and the surrounding region. As of the most recent record in July 2026, this office is staffed by a bench of 12 judges who collectively manage a high volume of disability claims. The office-wide approval rate in the latest period was 62%, reflecting the local standards for evidence and disability criteria.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Columbia SC

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 12 judges whose most recent office on record is the Columbia SC office, and 6 of them decided cases here in the latest file through July 2026. Approval rates for this bench range from 50% to 81% on their records since 2016.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions