SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Harry E. Siegrist

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 376 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The approval rate for Harry E. Siegrist is based on a total of 376 lifetime decisions. Within the Atlanta Downtown hearing office, the lifetime approval rates for all judges on record range from 23% to 86%. This wide variance highlights the importance of understanding the specific bench you are assigned. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 67%
Decisions on record 376

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Siegrist. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 29, 2017. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Siegrist's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Siegrist
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY17
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The record for Harry E. Siegrist spans from 2016 to 2017. During this period, his approval rate moved from 68% in 2016 to 66% in 2017. This stability suggests a consistent application of Social Security Administration guidelines throughout his time on the bench. The data indicates that his approach to evaluating medical evidence and vocational factors has stayed within a predictable range.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Siegrist's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Atlanta Downtown hearing office

The Atlanta Downtown hearing office serves you throughout the region, managing a high volume of disability hearings. With 22 judges on record, the office maintains a bench that reflects a broad spectrum of decision patterns. You can expect a formal process focused on the documentation of your impairments under 20 CFR Part 404. You can see the Atlanta Downtown Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 22 judges on record at this office since 2016. With lifetime approval rates across the office bench ranging from 23% to 86%, your assigned judge is a significant factor in your hearing process. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions