SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Sarah R. Smisek

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Livonia MI Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 20,565 lifetime decisions

Check My Benefits →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance requires looking at both lifetime and recent data. Judge Smisek currently holds a 60% lifetime approval rate, which sits slightly above the 57% approval rate seen across the Livonia MI office. With over 20,565 decisions, the statistical sample size provides a clear view of historical trends. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Metric Judge Smisek Livonia MI National
Approval rate 60% 57% 58%
Fully favorable 52%
Denials 41%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Smisek's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Smisek
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over a decade on the bench, Judge Smisek has seen approval rates fluctuate within a stable range. While the rate was 57% in 2023, recent data shows a slight uptick to 61% in 2025. This pattern suggests a consistent approach to evaluating disability claims, even as case volumes shift year to year. The latest period reflects a continuation of this steady pattern, indicating that the judge's decision-making process remains anchored in long-term trends.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Smisek's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Smisek? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Check My Benefits
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Livonia MI hearing office

The Livonia MI hearing office serves a significant portion of Michigan, managing a high volume of disability claims. With 6 judges on the bench, the office maintains an average approval rate of 57%. You can expect a formal process focused on medical evidence and vocational testimony. You can see the Livonia MI Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Within the Livonia MI office, lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 54% to 73%. Because of this variance, understanding the office environment is helpful, but the core requirements for proving your disability remain the same. You can find more information on the Livonia MI hearing office page.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Check My Benefits

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions