SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Shannon H. Smith

Last decided Franklin TNMay 2016
Decisions 235since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Understanding how a judge compares to their peers requires looking at the same data window. The most relevant benchmark is the range of approval rates among the 14 judges whose most recent office on record is the Franklin TN hearing office. These judges show a wide variance, with since-2016 approval rates ranging from 29% to 76%. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 34%
Decisions on record 235

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Smith. The most recent period with decisions on record is May 27, 2016. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Smith's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Smith
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Shannon H. Smith is based on 235 decisions on record since 2016. During the recorded window of January 2016 through May 2016, the data shows an approval rate of 34%. Because this record covers a specific, limited timeframe, it reflects the judge's activity during that period. This pattern provides a baseline for understanding how the judge has historically approached cases.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Smith's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Franklin TN hearing office

The Franklin TN hearing office serves you and other claimants throughout the region. With 14 judges whose most recent office on record is this location, the office manages a diverse caseload. While office-wide approval rates can offer a general sense of the environment, each judge maintains their own approach to evaluating evidence. You can see the Franklin TN hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Franklin TN

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. At the Franklin TN hearing office, there are 14 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. These judges exhibit a broad spectrum of approval rates, ranging from 29% to 76% on their since-2016 records. You can review the office's full roster to see how these patterns vary across the bench.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions