SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. D. Burgess Stalley

Last decided MobileJul 2026
Decisions 2,887since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Over the 12 months to July 31, 2026, Judge Stalley's 93% approval rate is measured against the Mobile office's 75%, the Alabama state rate of 62%, and the national average of 58%. These figures reflect recent activity, providing a view of the judge's decision patterns relative to broader benchmarks.

Last 12 months July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Stalley Mobile National
Approval rate 93% 75% 58%
Fully favorable 89% — —
Denials 7% — —
Decisions 179 — —
All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 81%
Decisions on record 2,887

SSA publishes no office- or national-level breakdown of fully favorable and denial rates. The 12 months are SSA's figures for this fiscal year to date plus the rest of the previous fiscal year; how we calculate them.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Stalley's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Stalley
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Judge Stalley has issued 2,887 decisions. The yearly approval trend shows fluctuations, with rates reaching 93% in the most recent 12-month window. This recent performance is higher than the 81% approval rate recorded across the entire period since 2016.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Stalley's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Mobile hearing office

The Mobile hearing office serves you and other claimants in the region. There are 18 judges whose most recent office on record is Mobile, with 10 of them having decided cases in the latest file. The office maintained a 75% approval rate over the 12 months to July 31, 2026.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Mobile

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge assigned to your hearing is essentially random. Among the 10 judges who decided cases here in SSA's latest file, approval rates range from 63% to 93% over the 12 months to July 31, 2026. There are 18 judges whose most recent office on record is Mobile, though only 10 have decided cases in the latest file.

Judges with similar approval rates

These active judges' approval rates over the same 12 months (July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026) are closest to Judge Stalley's 93%. One of them last decided cases in Alabama. With too few close matches there, the rest come from SSA's Atlanta region.

Rates within 5 points of each other are hard to tell apart at a typical caseload, so treat these as judges with comparable records, not a ranking. See Judge Stalley and the three closest side by side →

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions