SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Valorie Stefanelli

Last decided QueensJul 2026
Decisions 2,941since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe. While your 62% approval rate on record since 2016 provides a long-term view, the latest-period figures offer a snapshot of recent activity. In the most recent reporting period, your approval rate was 66%, compared to the 76% office-wide average. These figures are based on a total of 2,941 decisions on record since 2016.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 62%
Decisions on record 2,941
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Stefanelli Queens National
Approval rate 66% 76% 58%
Fully favorable 61% — —
Denials 34% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Stefanelli's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Stefanelli
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Your approval rate has fluctuated since 2016. After starting at 51% in 2016, your annual approval rate reached a peak of 78% in 2025. The latest fiscal year-to-date data shows a 66% approval rate over 74 decisions. This recent figure reflects a shift from the higher approval levels seen in the previous two years, though it remains within the range of your historical performance.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Stefanelli's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Queens hearing office

The Queens hearing office serves claimants in New York. This office hosts a bench of 11 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. In the latest reporting period, the office-wide approval rate was 76%. You can visit the Queens hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Queens

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 11 judges whose most recent office on record is the Queens hearing office. Approval rates for this bench range from 49% to 85% on their records since 2016.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions