SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Timothy G. Stewart

Last decided MetairieSep 2019
Decisions 1,261since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Understanding how your judge compares to their peers can help you prepare for your hearing. The 48% approval rate for Timothy G. Stewart is based on 1,261 decisions on record since 2016. When compared to the 24% to 54% range of other judges whose most recent office on record is Metairie, this figure offers context for the local bench. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 48%
Decisions on record 1,261

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Stewart. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 27, 2019. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Stewart's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Stewart
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY19
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval trend for Timothy G. Stewart showed a steady progression during his time on record. Starting at 44% in 2016, the approval rate reached 50% in 2017 and 2018, before rising to 52% in 2019. This 1,261-decision sample size reflects a consistent approach to case evaluation over the observed period. The gradual increase in the approval rate suggests a pattern that remained stable throughout his time at the Metairie office.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Stewart's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Metairie hearing office

Timothy G. Stewart's most recent office on record is the Metairie hearing office, with decisions there through September 2019. This office serves the Louisiana region and maintains a bench of 9 judges whose most recent records are tied to this location. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on the specific medical evidence presented in your file. You can see the Metairie Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Metairie

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 9 judges whose most recent office on record is Metairie, with approval rates ranging from 24% to 54% on their since-2016 records. Five of these judges decided cases here in the SSA's latest file. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions