SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Paul M. Stimson

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 2,979 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Your approval rate for Paul M. Stimson is based on 2,979 lifetime decisions recorded between 2016 and 2023. This figure provides a baseline for understanding how his decisions have historically aligned with the broader Memphis hearing office, where individual judge lifetime rates vary between 44% and 80%. Comparing these figures helps you contextualize your hearing, though aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predictions for your individual case.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 64%
Decisions on record 2,979

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Stimson. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 29, 2023. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Stimson's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Stimson
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY23
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Paul M. Stimson's record shows a consistent pattern of approvals over 2,979 lifetime decisions tracked since 2016. His annual approval rate fluctuated during this period, reaching a peak of 72% in 2021 before settling into a more moderate range in recent years. This trend reflects a steady approach to evaluating evidence, with the latest period showing a continuation of his established decision-making style.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Stimson's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Memphis hearing office

The Memphis hearing office serves you across Tennessee, operating as a critical hub for the region's disability hearings. The office maintains a bench of 14 judges on record, ensuring that a wide range of cases are processed through the Social Security Act system. You can expect a formal environment where the quality of your medical documentation remains the primary factor in any decision. You can see the Memphis Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Memphis hearing office utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to Paul M. Stimson is essentially random. There are 14 judges on record at this office since 2016, with 7 currently reporting in the latest SSA data. Because approval rates across this bench range from 44% to 80%, understanding the local environment is a standard part of your hearing preparation.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions