SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Suanne S. Strauss

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 926 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The approval rate for Suanne S. Strauss is based on 926 lifetime decisions recorded between 2016 and 2018. When evaluating this figure, consider the broader context of the Elkins Park hearing office, where lifetime approval rates among judges range from 33% to 82%. This variance highlights the importance of presenting a well-documented case regardless of the judge assigned. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 67%
Decisions on record 926

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Strauss. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 28, 2018. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Strauss's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Strauss
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY18
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

The record for Suanne S. Strauss spans from 2016 through 2018, providing a view of her decision-making pattern over that period. Her approval rate was 69% in 2016, 67% in 2017, and 62% in 2018. These fluctuations are common in Social Security Administration dockets and reflect changes in the complexity or volume of cases heard during a specific year.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Strauss's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Elkins Park hearing office

The Elkins Park hearing office serves claimants throughout the region, maintaining a bench of 25 judges on record since 2016. The office operates under the broader Office of Hearings Operations standards, where the latest-period approval rate is 61%. You can expect a formal process focused on the medical and vocational evidence presented in your file. You can visit the Elkins Park Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to Suanne S. Strauss is essentially random. There are 25 judges on record at this office since 2016, 11 of whom are reported in the latest period. Because lifetime approval rates at this office vary widely from 33% to 82%, understanding the bench is part of thorough preparation. The guidance for your case remains consistent regardless of which judge is assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions