SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Channing Strother

Last decided Philadelphia EastSep 2016
Decisions 150since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rate for Channing Strother is based on 150 decisions on record since 2016. This figure provides a baseline for understanding how the judge has historically evaluated claims. When compared to the broader bench at the Philadelphia East office, where approval rates for judges range from 44% to 71% since 2016, this data helps contextualize your hearing. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 49%
Decisions on record 150

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Strother. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 30, 2016. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Strother's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Strother
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The record for Channing Strother covers 150 decisions starting in 2016. Throughout this period, the approval rate remained steady at 49%. Because this data window is limited to the 2016 calendar year, it reflects a consistent approach to the evidence presented during that time. This pattern provides a stable view of past outcomes, though your individual case results depend heavily on the specific medical evidence and vocational factors unique to your claim.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Strother's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Philadelphia East hearing office

Channing Strother's most recent office on record is the Philadelphia East office, which serves claimants across the Pennsylvania region. This office maintains a bench of 9 judges who have processed a high volume of disability claims since 2016. You can expect a formal administrative process focused on the medical and vocational evidence supporting your disability claim.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Philadelphia East

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 9 judges whose most recent office on record is the Philadelphia East office, with approval rates ranging from 44% to 71% on their since-2016 records. While these figures vary, the procedural requirements for your hearing remain consistent.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions