Ramon Suris-Fernandez has an approval rate of 76% across 1,509 decisions on record since 2016. The judge's most recent office on record is the NHC Baltimore. Judges whose most recent office on record is this one range from 40% to 90% on their since-2016 records. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing. An attorney can help you prepare for this judge's specific bench.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
The approval rate for Ramon Suris-Fernandez is based on 1,509 decisions on record since 2016. This figure is compared against the 40% to 90% range seen among the 16 judges whose most recent office on record is the NHC Baltimore. Because case assignment is random, understanding the broader bench context is helpful for your preparation. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.
SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Suris-Fernandez. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 25, 2020. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Suris-Fernandez's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Since 2016, the approval rate for Ramon Suris-Fernandez has shown a generally rising trend, starting at 71% in 2016 and reaching 81% in 2019 before settling at 79% in 2020. With 1,509 total decisions on record, this pattern reflects a consistent approach to case evaluation over the observed period. The data suggests a stable decision-making process that has remained above the 70% mark throughout the window.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Suris-Fernandez's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
About the NHC Baltimore hearing office
The NHC Baltimore hearing office serves you if you are in Maryland and the surrounding region. There are 16 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. You can expect a standard hearing process where evidence quality and medical documentation remain the primary factors in a decision. See the NHC Baltimore Hearing Office page for the full roster.
Other judges whose most recent office on record is NHC Baltimore
The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 16 judges whose most recent office on record is the NHC Baltimore, with approval rates ranging from 40% to 90% on their since-2016 records. While you cannot choose your judge, understanding the variety of approaches at this office can help you prepare. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.
Approval rates change with a lawyer
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
Frequently asked questions
Ramon Suris-Fernandez has an approval rate of 76% on record since 2016, which sits within the 40% to 90% range of the 16 judges whose most recent office on record is the NHC Baltimore. An attorney can help you understand how to present your medical evidence to best fit the expectations of this bench.
The approval rate for Ramon Suris-Fernandez has trended upward from 71% in 2016 to 79% in 2020. This indicates a consistent pattern of decision-making over the 1,509 decisions on record. A qualified attorney can help you evaluate how these trends might impact your specific case strategy.
No, you cannot request a specific judge. The Social Security Administration assigns cases via a workload-balancing algorithm to ensure efficiency. An attorney can help you prepare for a hearing regardless of which judge is assigned to your case.
An SSDI hearing is a formal but non-adversarial proceeding where an ALJ reviews your medical records and testimony. You will likely answer questions about your work history and physical or mental limitations. An attorney can help you prepare your testimony to ensure your case is presented clearly.
The 76% approval rate for Ramon Suris-Fernandez represents a probability cloud from past decisions, not a prediction for your specific hearing. Your outcome depends primarily on the strength of your medical evidence and how well you document your disability. An attorney can help you gather the necessary evidence to strengthen your claim.




