SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Mark M. Swayze

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 3,781 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance requires looking at consistent data sets. Mark M. Swayze maintains a 27% lifetime approval rate, which sits within the 18% to 70% range observed across the San Antonio bench. In the most recent reporting period, his 34% approval rate is compared against the office-wide 52% rate to provide context on current trends. These figures rely on a sample of 3,781 lifetime decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 27%
Decisions on record 3,781
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Swayze San Antonio National
Approval rate 34% 52% 58%
Fully favorable 28%
Denials 66%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Swayze's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Swayze
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The record for Mark M. Swayze spans from 2016 to 2026, covering 3,781 total decisions. His approval rate has fluctuated over this period. While his lifetime average is 27%, the most recent data shows a 34% approval rate. This latest period reflects a departure from the lower rates seen between 2022 and 2023, suggesting a change in the recent flow of cases.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Swayze's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the San Antonio hearing office

The San Antonio hearing office serves you throughout the region, managing a high volume of disability cases. With 23 judges on record, the office maintains an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 52%. You can expect a formal process where evidence quality is the primary driver of the outcome. You can see the /disability-benefits/hearing-offices/san-antonio-TX Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The SSA assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment to Mark M. Swayze is essentially random. There are 23 judges on record at this office since 2016, 17 of whom reported in the latest period. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 18% to 70% on lifetime records. You can review the office's overall performance to understand the local environment.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions