SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Pedro Tejada-Rivera

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 3,544 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The approval rate for Pedro Tejada-Rivera sits within the broader range of the Orlando hearing office, where judges have lifetime approval rates spanning from 34% to 89%. This wide variance highlights why the specific judge assigned to your case matters. With 3,544 decisions on record, the data provides a stable look at the judge's history. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 66%
Decisions on record 3,544

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Tejada-Rivera. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 26, 2025. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Tejada-Rivera's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Tejada-Rivera
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the approval pattern for Pedro Tejada-Rivera has shown notable movement, trending from 59% in the early years to 80% in 2025. This trajectory suggests a shift in the volume of allowances over the last decade. While the yearly figures fluctuate, the overall lifetime average of 66% remains the most comprehensive indicator of the judge's record. This trend may reflect changes in case complexity or the quality of evidence presented in recent years.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Tejada-Rivera's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Orlando hearing office

The Orlando hearing office serves you across central Florida, managing a high volume of disability cases. The office bench includes 17 judges who have presided over thousands of hearings since 2016. You can expect a formal environment where the focus remains on medical documentation and vocational testimony. You can see the Orlando Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment to Pedro Tejada-Rivera is essentially random. There are 17 judges on record at the Orlando office since 2016, with 8 currently reporting in the latest SSA data. Because approval rates across these judges vary significantly, understanding the local bench is a standard part of case preparation. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions