SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Melissa Tenenbaum

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Seven Fields Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 13,198 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Tenenbaum?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's approval rate to broader benchmarks provides context for your hearing. Over 10 years on the bench, Judge Tenenbaum has maintained a record of 13,198 lifetime decisions. While her latest approval rate of 73% is notable, it is helpful to view this against the Seven Fields office average of 71% and the national average of 58%. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Tenenbaum Seven Fields National
Approval rate 61% 71% 58%
Fully favorable 62%
Denials 27%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Tenenbaum's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Tenenbaum
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Judge Tenenbaum has presided over 13,198 lifetime decisions during her 10-year tenure. Her approval trend has fluctuated, reflecting the evolving nature of disability claims and evidence requirements. While the rate dipped in 2019, recent data shows a return to higher approval levels. This pattern suggests a judge who evaluates each case based on the specific medical evidence you present during your hearing.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Tenenbaum's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Tenenbaum? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Seven Fields hearing office

The Seven Fields Hearing Office serves you and other claimants across Pennsylvania and the surrounding region. It is staffed by a team of ALJs who manage a high volume of disability cases annually. The office currently maintains an approval rate of 71%, reflecting local standards for evidence and testimony. You can see the Seven Fields Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The SSA assigns cases to judges using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment is essentially random. Across the Seven Fields office, lifetime approval rates among the six judges range from 54% to 71%. This variation highlights why understanding the general environment of your hearing office is more important than focusing on any single judge. You can find more information on the Seven Fields Hearing Office page.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions