Richard Thrasher is an SSA Administrative Law Judge at the Minneapolis office. Across the 1,445 decisions on record since 2016, 63% have been approved. The office's judges range from 26% to 68% on their lifetime records, and case assignment is random, so the judge you draw matters. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing. An attorney can help you prepare for this judge's specific bench.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
The approval rates for Richard Thrasher are based on 1,445 lifetime decisions, providing a clear view of how this judge has handled cases since 2016. When comparing these figures, it is important to look at the office-wide lifetime range of 26% to 68% to understand where this judge sits relative to peers. In the most recent reporting period, the 86% approval rate stands 34 points above the Minneapolis office average of 52%. These figures reflect historical trends rather than a guarantee of your outcome.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Thrasher's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Since 2016, Richard Thrasher has maintained a record of decisions that shows an upward trend in recent years. While the lifetime approval rate sits at 63%, the most recent data indicates a higher frequency of favorable outcomes compared to earlier years in the record. This shift suggests that the approach to evidence and case evaluation has evolved over the last decade. The latest period reflects a continuation of this recent pattern.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Thrasher's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
About the Minneapolis hearing office
The Minneapolis hearing office serves you throughout Minnesota and the surrounding region. With 16 judges on record, the office handles a diverse range of disability claims with an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 52%. You can expect a formal administrative process focused on medical evidence and vocational testimony. You can see the Minneapolis Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.
Other judges at this hearing office
SSA assigns cases to judges using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 16 judges on record at this office since 2016, 9 of whom reported in SSA's latest period. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 26% to 68% over their respective lifetimes. You can expect the same standard of review regardless of which judge is assigned to your case.
Approval rates change with a lawyer
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
Frequently asked questions
Richard Thrasher has a lifetime approval rate of 63%, which sits within the office-wide range of 26% to 68%. In the latest reporting period, the 86% approval rate is 34 points higher than the office average of 52%. An attorney can help you understand how these local trends might influence your case strategy.
Yes, the approval rate has trended upward since 2016. While the lifetime rate is 63%, recent years have seen higher approval percentages, with the latest period reaching 86%. An attorney can help you prepare evidence that aligns with the current decision patterns.
No, you cannot request a specific judge. The SSA uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases randomly to ensure efficiency. An attorney can help you prepare for your hearing regardless of which judge is assigned to your case.
An SSDI hearing is a formal but non-adversarial proceeding where a judge reviews your medical records and hears testimony. You may be questioned by the judge or a vocational expert about your ability to work. An attorney can help you prepare for these questions and present your case effectively.
A judge's approval rate is a statistical observation of past decisions and does not guarantee a specific outcome for your hearing. Your case's success depends primarily on the quality of your medical evidence and your ability to prove disability under SSA rules. An attorney can help you build a strong case tailored to the requirements of the hearing process.



