Richard Thrasher is an SSA Administrative Law Judge at the NHC CHICAGO office, where he has maintained a 62% lifetime approval rate over 8,275 decisions. His recent approval rate of 93% sits 4 percentage points above the national average of 58%. While these figures provide context, aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing. An attorney can help you prepare for the specific requirements of this judge's bench.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Judge Thrasher maintains a lifetime approval rate of 62% based on 8,275 lifetime decisions. In the most recent reporting period, his approval rate reached 93%, which stands 11 points above the NHC Chicago office average and 4 points above the national average. These figures provide a snapshot of his decision-making history over his 10-year tenure.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Thrasher's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Over his 10 years on the bench, Judge Thrasher has seen his approval rates shift. While his early years showed rates between 58% and 61%, the trend has moved upward since 2022, reaching 83% in 2024. This recent performance represents a departure from his earlier, more moderate decision patterns. Whether this reflects changes in the types of cases assigned or evolving evidentiary standards, the current data shows a sustained period of higher approval outcomes.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Thrasher's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
Hearing with Judge Thrasher? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.
Free Benefits ReviewAbout the Nhc Chicago hearing office
The NHC Chicago Hearing Office serves you and other claimants across Illinois and the surrounding region. It is one of the larger offices in the area, managing a high volume of cases with a bench of 6 judges. The office currently reports an approval rate of 51%, which serves as a baseline for the region. You can visit the NHC Chicago Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.
Other judges at this hearing office
The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning you cannot choose your judge. At the NHC Chicago Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the bench vary, ranging from 41% to 69%. This variance highlights why it is important to focus on the strength of your own medical evidence regardless of who is assigned to your hearing.
Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer
SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
