SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Peter V. Train

Last decided HarrisburgSep 2018
Decisions 1,142since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The 68% approval rate for Peter V. Train reflects his total decisions on record since 2016, which can be compared against the 17% to 86% range observed among the 13 judges whose most recent office on record is Harrisburg. These statistics rely on a substantial volume of 1,142 decisions to provide a clear picture of past activity. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 68%
Decisions on record 1,142

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Train. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 28, 2018. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Train's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Train
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY18
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Peter V. Train showed variation across the 1,142 decisions on record since January 2016. The data indicates an approval rate of 62% in 2016, 72% in 2017, and 69% in 2018. These fluctuations reflect shifts in the complexity of cases or the quality of medical evidence presented in a given year.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Train's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Harrisburg hearing office

Peter V. Train's most recent office on record is the Harrisburg hearing office. This office features a bench of 13 judges who have handled a wide variety of disability claims since 2016. You can expect a formal process where the quality of your medical documentation is the primary factor in your decision.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Harrisburg

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 13 judges whose most recent office on record is Harrisburg, with approval rates ranging from 17% to 86% on their since-2016 records. While these statistics provide context for the office, they do not dictate the outcome of your specific hearing.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions