SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Joy Turner

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 4,044 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

To understand how Turner compares to the broader bench, we look at both lifetime and latest-period data. While her lifetime approval rate sits at 75%, her latest-period performance shows a 75% approval rate, which is 18 percentage points higher than the Detroit office's latest-period average of 57%. These figures are derived from 4,044 lifetime decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 75%
Decisions on record 4,044
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Turner Detroit National
Approval rate 75% 57% 58%
Fully favorable 71%
Denials 25%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Turner's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Turner
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Turner has maintained a steady approval pattern throughout her record, which began in 2016. While yearly approval rates have fluctuated—ranging from a low of 69% in 2022 to a high of 85% in 2024—the judge has consistently returned to a stable baseline. The latest reporting period shows a 75% approval rate, which aligns closely with her long-term average. This trend suggests a consistent approach to evaluating evidence.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Turner's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Detroit hearing office

The Detroit hearing office serves you throughout Michigan and the surrounding region. With a bench of 12 judges on record, this office handles a high volume of cases with an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 57%. You can expect a formal hearing process where evidence quality is the primary factor in a favorable decision. See the Detroit hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 12 judges on record at this office since 2016, 9 of whom reported in SSA's latest period, with lifetime approval rates ranging from 25% to 75%. Because of this variance, understanding the general environment of the Detroit office is vital. You can find more information on the Detroit hearing office page.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions