SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Joy Turner

Last decided DetroitJul 2026
Decisions 4,044since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes to ensure accuracy. While the 75% approval rate on record since 2016 provides a long-term view, recent performance is also critical. In the latest reporting period, the judge maintained a 75% approval rate, which sits 18 points above the Detroit office average of 57%. These figures are derived from 4,044 total decisions on record. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 75%
Decisions on record 4,044
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Turner Detroit National
Approval rate 75% 57% 58%
Fully favorable 71% — —
Denials 25% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Turner's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Turner
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since January 2016, the judge has issued 4,044 decisions, showing a generally steady trend with some yearly variance. While the approval rate saw a peak of 85% in 2024, the most recent data from 2026 shows a return to 75%. This pattern suggests that while individual years may fluctuate based on case complexity or evidence quality, the long-term approach remains consistent. The latest period reflects a continuation of this steady pattern.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Turner's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Detroit hearing office

Joy Turner's most recent office on record is the Detroit hearing office, with decisions there through July 2026. This office serves the Michigan region and maintains a bench of 12 judges. The office-wide latest-period approval rate is 57%, providing a benchmark for the local judicial environment. You can expect a standard administrative process focused on medical evidence and vocational testimony.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Detroit

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 12 judges whose most recent office on record is the Detroit office, and 9 of them decided cases here in the latest file from July 2026. Approval rates across this bench range from 25% to 75% on their since-2016 records. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions