SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Jeanne M. VanderHeide

Last decided Rio Grande Valley TXJul 2026
Decisions 3,370since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. While Jeanne M. VanderHeide has a 65% approval rate on record since 2016, her latest-period performance shows a 33% approval rate, which is below the office, state, and national averages for that same recent window. These figures are derived from 3,370 decisions on record. Aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predicting individual hearing outcomes.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 65%
Decisions on record 3,370
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge VanderHeide Rio Grande Valley TX National
Approval rate 33% 55% 58%
Fully favorable 33% — —
Denials 67% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge VanderHeide's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge VanderHeide
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Jeanne M. VanderHeide has maintained a steady approval pattern with yearly fluctuations. After an approval rate of 69% in 2016, the figures shifted over time, reaching 72% in 2024. The most recent data from 2026 shows a 33% approval rate over 5 decisions, representing a partial fiscal year. This recent period reflects the variability inherent in individual case outcomes.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge VanderHeide's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Rio Grande Valley TX hearing office

Jeanne M. VanderHeide's most recent office on record is the Rio Grande Valley TX hearing office, with decisions there through July 2026. This office manages a bench of 4 judges whose most recent records are tied to this location. The office-wide approval rate in the latest reporting period was 55%, providing a benchmark for the local hearing environment.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Rio Grande Valley TX

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your judge assignment is random. There are 4 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with 3 of them having decided cases in the latest SSA file. Approval rates for this bench range from 40% to 65% on their records since 2016. Your preparation remains consistent regardless of which judge is assigned to your case.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions