SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Gonzalo Vallecillo

Last decided Tampa OHOJul 2026
Decisions 2,574since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. While Gonzalo Vallecillo has a 45% approval rate across his total record since 2016, his latest-period approval rate of 64% sits 5 percentage points above the Tampa OHO office average of 59%. These figures are derived from a docket of 2,574 decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 45%
Decisions on record 2,574
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Vallecillo Tampa OHO National
Approval rate 64% 59% 58%
Fully favorable 54% — —
Denials 36% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Vallecillo's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Vallecillo
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since April 2016, the approval rate for Gonzalo Vallecillo has shifted. After a period of lower approval rates between 2017 and 2018, the trend moved upward, reaching 64% in the most recent partial fiscal year. This latest-period rate diverges from the long-term average of 45% on record. The recent data reflects a trend that may be influenced by changes in case mix or the quality of evidence presented in recent hearings.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Vallecillo's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Tampa OHO hearing office

Gonzalo Vallecillo's most recent office on record is the Tampa OHO, with decisions there through July 2026. This office serves claimants across Florida. With 16 judges on its bench, the office maintains an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 59%. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on medical and vocational evidence. See the Tampa OHO Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Tampa OHO

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 16 judges whose most recent office on record is the Tampa OHO, 11 of whom decided cases in the latest file through July 2026. Approval rates among this bench range from 31% to 90% based on their records since 2016. Preparation remains consistent regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions