Christopher Van Dyck's most recent office on record is the Fort Worth hearing office, with decisions there through September 2025. Across the 3,411 decisions on record since January 2016, 53% have been approved. Judges whose most recent office on record is this one range from 32% to 63% on their since-2016 records, and case assignment is random. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing. An attorney can help you prepare for your hearing.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Comparing judicial approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe to ensure accuracy. The 53% approval rate for Christopher Van Dyck reflects his total decisions on record since 2016, which provides a sample size of 3,411 cases. This figure can be viewed alongside the broader bench at the Fort Worth hearing office, where peers range from 32% to 63% approval on their respective records. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.
SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Van Dyck. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 26, 2025. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Van Dyck's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
The approval rate for Christopher Van Dyck has fluctuated over the years, starting at 52% in 2016 and reaching 57% in 2024. Throughout the 3,411 decisions on record since 2016, the trend has shown periods of both higher and lower activity, reflecting the inherent variability in disability case evidence. While the 2025 data represents a partial year, the overall pattern suggests a judge who evaluates each claim based on its unique medical and vocational evidence.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Van Dyck's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
About the Fort Worth hearing office
The Fort Worth hearing office serves claimants across Texas and is part of a regional network dedicated to processing disability appeals. With 15 judges whose most recent office on record is this location, the office manages a diverse caseload. You can expect a formal administrative process where evidence quality is the primary factor in your outcome.
Other judges whose most recent office on record is Fort Worth
The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 15 judges whose most recent office on record is the Fort Worth hearing office, with 6 of them having decided cases in the latest available SSA file. Because approval rates across this bench range from 32% to 63%, understanding the local context is helpful for your preparation.
Approval rates change with a lawyer
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
Frequently asked questions
Christopher Van Dyck has a 53% approval rate on record since 2016. This sits within the 32% to 63% range observed among the 15 judges whose most recent office on record is the Fort Worth hearing office. An attorney can help you prepare for the specific requirements of this bench.
The judge's approval rate has varied year-over-year, moving from 52% in 2016 to 57% in 2024. These fluctuations are common in SSDI hearings as case mixes and evidence quality change. An attorney can help you understand how these trends might relate to your specific case.
No, you cannot request a specific judge. The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm to ensure efficiency. Since you cannot choose your judge, focusing on the strength of your medical evidence is the best way to prepare. An attorney can help you prepare your case.
An SSDI hearing is a non-adversarial proceeding where an ALJ reviews your medical records and hears your testimony. You may be questioned about your work history and daily limitations. An attorney can help you prepare your testimony and organize your evidence for the hearing.
An approval rate is a statistical summary of past decisions and is not a prediction of your specific outcome. Every case is decided on its own merits, including the medical evidence and vocational factors you present. An attorney can help you evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of your claim.




