SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Gary L. Vanderhoof

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Las Vegas Hearing Office · 3 years on the bench · 8,596 lifetime decisions

Check My Benefits →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

When reviewing the performance of an Administrative Law Judge, it is helpful to compare their lifetime record against current office and national benchmarks. Judge Vanderhoof's 31% lifetime approval rate is measured against a Las Vegas Hearing Office latest approval rate of 60% and a national average of 58%. These figures are derived from a docket of 8,596 lifetime decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Vanderhoof Las Vegas National
Approval rate 31% 60% 58%
Fully favorable 26%
Denials 69%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Vanderhoof's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Vanderhoof
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY18
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over his 3 years on the bench, Judge Vanderhoof has maintained a distinct decision pattern. His approval rate moved from 39% in 2016 to 30% in 2017, and 15% in 2018. Such patterns are common in Social Security Disability Insurance hearings and often depend on the specific mix of medical evidence and vocational factors presented in your case.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Vanderhoof's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Vanderhoof? See if a free benefits review fits your case.

Check My Benefits
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Las Vegas hearing office

The Las Vegas Hearing Office serves a large population across Nevada, managing a high volume of disability claims. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains an office-wide latest approval rate of 60%. You can expect a rigorous review process focused on your medical documentation and vocational capacity. You can see the Las Vegas Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Within the Las Vegas Hearing Office, the bench consists of 6 judges with lifetime approval rates ranging from 31% to 68%. While these variations exist, the fundamental requirements for proving your disability remain consistent. You can find more information on the Las Vegas Hearing Office page.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Check My Benefits

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions