SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Shelette Veal

Last decided IndianapolisJul 2026
Decisions 3,756since 2017

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

When reviewing the performance of Shelette Veal, it is helpful to compare her approval rate on record since 2017 against the broader bench at the Indianapolis Hearing Office. While the office-wide bench shows a range of 43% to 75% for decisions since 2016, Shelette Veal's 66% approval rate provides a specific reference point for her docket. These figures are based on 3,756 decisions on record. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2017
Approval rate 66%
Decisions on record 3,756
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Veal Indianapolis National
Approval rate 72% 64% 58%
Fully favorable 67% — —
Denials 28% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Veal's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Veal
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Shelette Veal has fluctuated since 2017. After an 83% approval rate in 2017, the figures shifted in subsequent years before reaching a 72% approval rate in the latest reporting period. This latest-period performance sits 8 percentage points above the Indianapolis Hearing Office average of 64%. The recent trend reflects a steady pattern, though your case outcome depends on the evidence you present.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Veal's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Indianapolis hearing office

The Indianapolis Hearing Office serves you and other claimants across Indiana and the surrounding region. As of the most recent data through July 2026, the office maintains an approval rate of 64% for the latest reporting period. With a bench of 20 judges, the office handles a significant volume of disability claims. For more information, see the Indianapolis Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Indianapolis

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 20 judges whose most recent office on record is the Indianapolis Hearing Office, 11 of whom decided cases in the latest SSA file. These judges demonstrate a wide range of approval rates, from 43% to 75% on their since-2016 records. You should prepare your case thoroughly regardless of which judge is assigned to your hearing.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions