SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Kevin Vodak

Last decided EvanstonJul 2026
Decisions 4,177since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. Kevin Vodak's 54% approval rate since 2016 provides a long-term view, while latest-period data allows for a current comparison against office, state, and national benchmarks. With 4,177 decisions on record, the data offers a stable look at past performance. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 54%
Decisions on record 4,177
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Vodak Evanston National
Approval rate 60% 61% 58%
Fully favorable 50% — —
Denials 40% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Vodak's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Vodak
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Kevin Vodak has maintained a varied approval pattern across 4,177 decisions. The yearly trend shows fluctuations, with rates moving from 47% in 2016 to 60% in the partial 2026 fiscal year. This recent performance sits slightly above the long-term average. These patterns illustrate how cases have been approached over the last decade, though each hearing remains unique.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Vodak's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Evanston hearing office

Kevin Vodak's most recent office on record is the Evanston hearing office, with decisions there through July 2026. This office maintains a bench of 15 judges whose most recent office on record is this one. The office-wide latest approval rate is 61%, providing context for the local hearing environment.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Evanston

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 15 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, and 6 of them decided cases here in SSA's latest file. Approval rates for this bench range from 45% to 79% on their since-2016 records.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions