SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Ronald L. Waldman

On record 2,162 decisions since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rates for this judge are calculated based on 2,162 lifetime decisions recorded between 2016 and 2022. When evaluating these figures, compare them against the broader bench at the Long Island office, where lifetime approval rates for judges range from 48% to 83%. This range provides a baseline for understanding how individual judicial patterns fit within the local office environment. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 83%
Decisions on record 2,162

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Waldman. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 30, 2022. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Waldman's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Waldman
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY21
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Ronald L. Waldman's record shows a consistent approach to disability adjudication between 2016 and 2022. The yearly trend indicates that approval rates remained steady, fluctuating within a stable range throughout the observed window. While the volume of decisions varied by year, the overall pattern suggests a reliable consistency in how your case is evaluated. This stability provides a clear view of the judge's historical decision-making.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Waldman's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Long Island hearing office

The Long Island hearing office serves you and other claimants across the region, operating as a hub for SSDI hearings in New York. The office maintains a bench of 12 judges on record, ensuring that your case is processed through a structured, administrative framework. You can generally expect a formal hearing process focused on your medical evidence and vocational testimony. You can visit the Long Island Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The SSA assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 12 judges on record at this office since 2016, with lifetime approval rates spanning from 48% to 83%. Because of this variance, understanding the local bench is a standard part of your case preparation. The guidance for your hearing remains consistent regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions