SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Nicholas Walter

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Greenville Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 17,023 lifetime decisions

Check My Benefits →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Evaluating a judge's history provides context for your hearing, as approval rates fluctuate based on case complexity and evidence. Judge Walter has maintained a 63% lifetime approval rate across 17,023 decisions, which currently tracks 5 points above the national average of 58%. While your latest reporting period shows an approval rate of 71%, these figures represent past decisions rather than a prediction for your specific hearing.

Metric Judge Walter Greenville National
Approval rate 63% 65% 58%
Fully favorable 33%
Denials 67%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Walter's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Walter
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over a 10-year tenure, Judge Walter has demonstrated a dynamic decision-making pattern. Approval rates shifted from the mid-50% range in your early years to a peak of 74% in 2022. The latest reporting period indicates a 71% approval rate, suggesting a return to higher favorability after a brief dip in 2023. These shifts often reflect changes in the case mix or the specific nature of the evidence presented during those years.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Walter's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Walter? See if a free benefits review fits your case.

Check My Benefits
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Greenville hearing office

The Special Review Cadre serves as a specialized hearing office within the SSA system, handling a high volume of complex disability claims. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains a consistent workflow designed to process applications efficiently. You can expect a formal administrative environment focused on the medical and vocational evidence of your specific claim. You can see the Special Review Cadre Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Within the Special Review Cadre, lifetime approval rates across the bench range from 32% to 63%. Because of this variance, understanding the broader office environment is as important as looking at a single judge's history. You can find more information on the hearing office page.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Check My Benefits

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions