SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. M. Thayne Warner

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Salt Lake City Hearing Office · 3 years on the bench · 4,374 lifetime decisions

Check My Benefits →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge Warner maintains an approval rate that consistently exceeds both the Salt Lake City office average and the national benchmark. In the most recent reporting period, the judge approved 84% of cases, compared to the 54% office-wide average and the 58% national average. These figures are derived from a substantial docket of 4,374 lifetime decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predicting the outcome of your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Warner Salt Lake City National
Approval rate 85% 54% 58%
Fully favorable 76%
Denials 16%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Warner's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Warner
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY23FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over three years on the bench, Judge Warner has maintained a high approval frequency. After an initial 92% approval rate in 2023, the rate was 83% in 2024 and 86% in 2025. This trend indicates a stable approach to case evaluation that remains above regional and national norms. The recent data reflects a consistent pattern of decision-making throughout the judge's tenure.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Warner's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Have a hearing with Judge Warner? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Check My Benefits
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Salt Lake City hearing office

The Salt Lake City Hearing Office serves you and other claimants across Utah and surrounding regions, managing a high volume of disability appeals. With a bench of 6 judges, the office handles a diverse range of medical and vocational evidence. The latest office-wide approval rate is 54%, which provides a baseline for the local hearing environment. You can visit the Salt Lake City Hearing Office page for more information on the local roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases to judges using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment is essentially random. Within the Salt Lake City office, lifetime approval rates among the bench vary significantly, ranging from 28% to 85%. Because each judge has a unique approach to evidence, understanding the office-wide landscape is helpful for your preparation.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Check My Benefits

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions