Carl Bennett Watson's most recent office on record is the Charleston SC hearing office, with decisions there through July 2026. Across the 3,387 decisions on record since 2016, 46% have been approved. Judges whose most recent office on record is this one range from 17% to 87% on their since-2016 records. Because case assignment is random, the judge you draw matters. An attorney can help you prepare for your hearing.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. While your judge's since-2016 approval rate is 46%, the latest-period data shows an approval rate of 49%. This sits alongside an office-wide latest-period rate of 48%, a state rate of 60%, and a national rate of 58%. These figures are derived from a docket of 3,387 decisions on record since 2016. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Watson's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Your judge's approval rate has fluctuated since 2016. After a peak in 2018, the annual approval rate saw a decline before stabilizing in recent years. The latest-period approval rate of 49% is slightly higher than the overall average on record. This trend reflects a consistent approach to the evidence presented in each case, with the most recent data showing a steady pattern of decision-making.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Watson's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
About the Charleston SC hearing office
Carl Bennett Watson's most recent office on record is the Charleston SC hearing office, with decisions there through July 2026. This office serves you and other claimants across South Carolina. With 15 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, the office maintains a latest-period approval rate of 48%. You can expect a review of your medical evidence at this location. See the Charleston SC Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.
Other judges whose most recent office on record is Charleston SC
The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 15 judges whose most recent office on record is the Charleston SC office, with 5 of them having decided cases in the latest SSA file. Approval rates across this bench range from 17% to 87% on their since-2016 records. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.
Approval rates change with a lawyer
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
Frequently asked questions
Carl Bennett Watson has an approval rate of 46% on record since 2016. Across the 15 judges whose most recent office on record is the Charleston SC office, approval rates range from 17% to 87%. An attorney can help you prepare for the specific requirements of this judge's bench.
The approval rate for Carl Bennett Watson has varied over the years, starting at 48% in 2016 and reaching 49% in the most recent fiscal year to date. These shifts are common and often reflect changes in the types of cases or evidence presented. A qualified attorney can help you understand how to present your case effectively.
No, you cannot request a specific judge. The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm to ensure efficiency. Because you cannot choose your judge, working with an attorney is the best way to prepare for any outcome.
An SSDI hearing is a formal but non-adversarial proceeding where a judge reviews your medical records and testimony. You will have the opportunity to explain how your impairments prevent you from working. Having an attorney by your side ensures your evidence is organized and your testimony is focused on the criteria the judge uses to make a decision.
The 46% approval rate on record since 2016 represents a probability based on past decisions, not a prediction for your specific hearing. Every case is unique, and the quality of your medical evidence is the most important factor in a favorable outcome. An attorney can help you build a case that meets the specific standards required for approval.




