SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Wallace E. Weakley

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 760 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The approval rate for Wallace E. Weakley is based on 760 lifetime decisions recorded between 2016 and 2018. This figure provides a baseline for understanding how the judge has historically approached disability claims. When evaluating this data, it is helpful to compare it against the broader office-wide lifetime range of 31% to 90% for all judges on record. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 44%
Decisions on record 760

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Weakley. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 28, 2018. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Weakley's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Weakley
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY18
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The record for Wallace E. Weakley covers 760 lifetime decisions starting in 2016. The yearly trend shows some fluctuation, with approval rates moving from 43% in 2016 to 47% in 2017, before shifting to 38% in 2018. This pattern indicates that the judge's decision-making has varied over the course of the available data window. These shifts may reflect changes in the types of cases assigned or the specific evidence presented during those periods.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Weakley's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Tampa hearing office

The Tampa hearing office serves you throughout the region in Florida. As part of a large office with 16 judges on record, the facility manages a high volume of disability hearings. You can expect a formal legal environment where the quality of medical evidence remains the primary factor in any decision. You can see the Tampa Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

Social Security disability cases are assigned using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 16 judges on record at this office since 2016, 11 of whom reported in the latest period. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 31% to 90% over their respective lifetime records.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions