SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. William Wenzel

Last decided ChicagoSep 2022
Decisions 1,244since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent data windows. The 71% approval rate for William Wenzel reflects all decisions on record since 2016, which we measure against the 41% to 82% range of other judges whose most recent office on record is also Chicago. This comparison provides a view of the local bench's decision-making history. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 71%
Decisions on record 1,244

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Wenzel. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 30, 2022. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Wenzel's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Wenzel
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY22
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, William Wenzel has maintained a consistent approval pattern across 1,244 decisions. The yearly trend shows fluctuations, with approval rates moving from 65% in 2016 to 71% in 2017, 71% in 2018, 79% in 2019, 69% in 2020, 67% in 2021, and 74% in 2022. These shifts often reflect changes in the complexity of cases or the quality of medical evidence presented.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Wenzel's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Chicago hearing office

William Wenzel's most recent office on record is the Chicago hearing office, with decisions there through September 2022. This office serves the Illinois region and maintains a bench of 14 judges. You can expect a standard hearing process where the thoroughness of your medical documentation remains the primary factor in a decision.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Chicago

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you draw is essentially random. There are 14 judges whose most recent office on record is Chicago. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 41% to 82%. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions