SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. T. Whitaker

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Indianapolis Hearing Office · 5 years on the bench · 12,530 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Whitaker?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's history to broader trends provides context for your hearing. T. Whitaker maintains a 56% lifetime approval rate, which currently tracks 5 points below the Indianapolis Hearing Office average of 61% and 2 points below the national average of 58%. These figures are derived from a significant docket of 12,530 lifetime decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predicting your specific hearing outcome.

Metric Judge Whitaker Indianapolis National
Approval rate 56% 61% 58%
Fully favorable 48%
Denials 44%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Whitaker's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Whitaker
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY20
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over a 5-year tenure, your judge's approval rate has fluctuated between 52% and 61%. While the rate dipped in 2018, the most recent data from 2020 shows a 61% annual approval rate. This variation is common and may reflect changes in the types of cases heard or the quality of evidence presented. These trends remain responsive to the specific merits of each case.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Whitaker's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Whitaker? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Indianapolis hearing office

The Indianapolis Hearing Office serves a large population across Indiana, managing a high volume of disability claims. With a bench of 6 judges and an office-wide latest approval rate of 61%, this office handles a diverse array of medical and vocational evidence. You can expect a formal hearing environment where clear documentation is the primary driver of success. You can visit the Indianapolis Hearing Office page for more information.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning you cannot choose your judge. At the Indianapolis Hearing Office, the office's 6 ALJs range from 48% to 72% in their lifetime approval rates. This variance highlights why focusing on the strength of your medical evidence is essential regardless of the specific judge assigned to your case.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions