SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Penny Wilkov

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 3,449 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The approval rates for Penny Wilkov reflect a career spanning 3,449 decisions. When comparing her latest-period performance to the broader San Antonio bench, which features a lifetime approval range of 18% to 70%, it is clear that individual judicial patterns vary significantly. These figures are based on the most recent reporting period to ensure an accurate comparison against office, state, and national benchmarks. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 41%
Decisions on record 3,449
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Wilkov San Antonio National
Approval rate 49% 52% 58%
Fully favorable 35%
Denials 51%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Wilkov's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Wilkov
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the decision pattern for Penny Wilkov has shown a gradual evolution in approval frequency. The latest period shows a 49% approval rate, which sits 3 points below the office-wide latest-period average. This recent trend reflects a continuation of her steady pattern of case evaluation, providing a baseline for how your evidence may be reviewed.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Wilkov's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the San Antonio hearing office

The San Antonio hearing office serves you throughout the region, maintaining a busy docket with a diverse bench of 23 judges. The office-wide latest-period approval rate is 52%, providing a baseline for the local environment. You can expect a formal hearing process where the quality of your medical evidence remains the primary driver of the outcome. See the San Antonio Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The San Antonio hearing office utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to Penny Wilkov is essentially random. There are 23 judges on record at this office since 2016, 17 of whom reported in the latest SSA period. With a wide range of approval rates across the bench, the specific judge you draw matters, though the preparation process remains consistent regardless of your assignment.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions