SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Barry L. Williams

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Atlanta North Hearing Office · 2 years on the bench · 3,085 lifetime decisions

Check My Benefits →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance to broader benchmarks provides context for your hearing. Judge Williams maintains a 67% lifetime approval rate, which stands notably above the 49% latest approval rate for the Atlanta North office. He also trends 9 percentage points higher than both the state and national averages of 58%. These figures are derived from a substantial docket of 3,085 lifetime decisions.

Metric Judge Williams Atlanta North National
Approval rate 67% 49% 58%
Fully favorable 57%
Denials 33%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Williams's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Williams
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY17
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over his 2 years on the bench, Judge Williams has maintained a consistent approach to disability claims. His approval rate has remained steady, moving from 67% in 2016 to 66% in 2017. This stability suggests a predictable decision-making framework for your appearance before him. The consistency in these figures indicates that his approach to evaluating evidence has held firm throughout his tenure.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Williams's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Williams? See if a free benefits review fits your case.

Check My Benefits
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Atlanta North hearing office

The Atlanta North Hearing Office serves a large population across Georgia, managing a high volume of SSDI claims. With a bench of 6 judges, the office handles a diverse range of medical and vocational evidence daily. You can expect a formal environment focused on the specific requirements of 20 CFR Part 404. You can see the Atlanta North Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your judge is selected randomly. Within the Atlanta North office, lifetime approval rates among the 6 judges vary significantly, ranging from 22% to 67%. This variance highlights why the specific judge assigned to your case can influence the process. You can find more information on the Atlanta North hearing office page.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Check My Benefits

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions