SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. David Willis

Last decided MemphisJul 2026
Decisions 3,154since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

To understand how David Willis compares to his peers, you can look at both long-term records and recent performance. Since 2016, the approval-rate range for the 14 judges whose most recent office on record is Memphis spans from 44% to 80%. In the most recent reporting period, David Willis maintained an approval rate of 66%, which is 11 percentage points higher than the office average of 55%. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 50%
Decisions on record 3,154
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Willis Memphis National
Approval rate 66% 55% 58%
Fully favorable 60% — —
Denials 34% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Willis's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Willis
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, David Willis has issued 3,154 decisions, showing a varied approval trend over the last decade. After an initial period of fluctuation between 2016 and 2019, the approval rate saw a notable rise in 2020 and has continued to shift, reaching 66% in the most recent partial year of 2026. This latest figure represents a divergence from his long-term average, potentially reflecting changes in case complexity or the specific evidence presented in recent dockets.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Willis's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Memphis hearing office

The Memphis hearing office is the most recent office on record for David Willis, with his last recorded decision there in July 2026. As of the most recent data through July 2026, this office maintains an average approval rate of 55%. With a bench of 14 judges, the office handles a high volume of disability claims, requiring you to be well-prepared with comprehensive medical documentation.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Memphis

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge assigned to your hearing is essentially random. There are 14 judges whose most recent office on record is Memphis, and 7 of them decided cases in the latest SSA file through July 2026. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 44% to 80% based on records since 2016.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions