SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Ben Willner

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Nhc Albuquerque Hearing Office · 8 years on the bench · 13,796 lifetime decisions

Check My Benefits →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

When evaluating your claim, it is helpful to look at how Judge Willner compares to broader benchmarks. His lifetime approval rate of 39% is measured against the latest office average of 50% and the national average of 58%. These figures are derived from a significant docket of 13,796 lifetime decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Willner Nhc Albuquerque National
Approval rate 39% 50% 58%
Fully favorable 33%
Denials 61%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Willner's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Willner
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY21
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over his 8 years on the bench, Judge Willner has presided over 13,796 lifetime decisions. His yearly trend shows a decline in approval rates from 47% in 2016 to 29% in 2021. This pattern reflects the specific cases heard during his tenure rather than a change in his personal approach to the law. The latest period reflects a continuation of this steady trend.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Willner's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Willner? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Check My Benefits
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Nhc Albuquerque hearing office

The NHC Albuquerque Hearing Office serves you throughout New Mexico and the surrounding region. With a bench of 6 judges, this office manages a high volume of cases to ensure timely processing for your disability benefits. The office currently maintains an approval rate of 50%, which serves as a local benchmark for your hearing. You can visit the NHC Albuquerque Hearing Office page for more information on the local roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Within the NHC Albuquerque Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 39% to 61%. This variation highlights why focusing on the strength of your own medical evidence is essential. The guidance for your preparation remains consistent regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Check My Benefits

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions