Kenneth Wilson is an SSA Administrative Law Judge at the Cincinnati Hearing Office. Over 4 years on the bench, they have maintained a 77% lifetime approval rate across 6,384 lifetime decisions. This is higher than the national latest approval rate of 58%. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing. An attorney can help you prepare for the specific requirements of this judge's courtroom.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
When evaluating your potential hearing outcome, it is helpful to look at how Judge Wilson's approval rate compares to broader benchmarks. Currently, the judge's approval rate is 21 points higher than the Cincinnati office average and 19 points higher than the national average of 58%. These figures are derived from a docket of 6,384 lifetime decisions over 4 years on the bench. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Wilson's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Judge Wilson's career shows a trend, beginning with a 66% approval rate in 2016 and peaking at 85% in 2017. Following this period, the rate was 84% in 2018 before adjusting to 74% in 2019. This pattern reflects a history of decision-making over 4 years on the bench.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Wilson's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
Hearing with Judge Wilson? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.
Free Benefits ReviewAbout the Cincinnati hearing office
The Cincinnati Hearing Office serves a large population across Ohio, managing a volume of disability claims with a bench of 6 judges. The office currently reports an average approval rate of 56%, which provides a baseline for the region. You can expect a formal process focused on medical documentation and vocational testimony. You can visit the Cincinnati Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.
Other judges at this hearing office
The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Within the Cincinnati office, lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 37% to 77%. Because of this variance, it is common to research your assigned judge to understand the local environment.
Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer
SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
