Robert Wright is an SSA Administrative Law Judge at the Albany Hearing Office. With a lifetime approval rate of 70% across 11,878 lifetime decisions, he sits above the national latest approval rate of 58%. While your recent rates have fluctuated, you remain a significant presence in the region. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing. An attorney can help you prepare for the specific requirements of your hearing.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Judge Wright maintains a lifetime approval rate of 70% across 11,878 lifetime decisions. Compared to the latest reporting period, this judge sits 3 points above the Albany office average of 67% and 12 points above the national average of 58%. This data provides a statistical baseline for understanding how cases are processed in this jurisdiction.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Wright's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
The approval trend for Judge Wright shows a period of stability followed by a recent decline. Early years on the bench saw approval rates between 71% and 75%. More recent data indicates a shift, with approval rates moving to 66% and 55% in the final years of the provided tenure. This pattern suggests that the latest period reflects a departure from earlier trends.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Wright's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
Hearing with Judge Wright? See if a free benefits review fits your case.
Free Benefits ReviewAbout the Albany hearing office
The Albany Hearing Office serves claimants across New York and operates as a hub for regional disability adjudications. With a bench of 6 judges, the office manages a high volume of cases with a recent office-wide approval rate of 67%. You can expect a formal process focused on your medical documentation and vocational evidence.
Other judges at this hearing office
The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Across the Albany bench, lifetime approval rates range from 49% to 81%, illustrating that judicial philosophy varies significantly within the same office. Regardless of which judge is assigned to your hearing, the fundamental requirements for proving disability remain consistent.
Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer
SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
