SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. George C. Yatron

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 2,402 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Understanding how your judge compares to their peers is a key part of preparing for your hearing. At the Elkins Park office, lifetime approval rates among the bench vary significantly, ranging from 33% to 82%. With 2,402 decisions on record, the data for George C. Yatron provides a clear view of his historical decision-making patterns. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 54%
Decisions on record 2,402

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Yatron. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 25, 2020. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Yatron's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Yatron
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY20
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The record for George C. Yatron spans from 2016 to 2020, covering 2,402 total decisions. His yearly approval trend shows fluctuation, starting at 56% in 2016 and reaching 46% in 2020. This variation is common in administrative law, often reflecting changes in the complexity of cases or the medical evidence presented. These patterns help you understand the historical context of your hearing, though every case is evaluated on its own merits.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Yatron's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Elkins Park hearing office

The Elkins Park hearing office serves you if you are a claimant throughout Pennsylvania and the surrounding region. With a bench of 25 judges on record, the office maintains a consistent workflow to process disability claims. You can expect a formal environment where medical evidence and vocational testimony are central to the proceedings. You can see the Elkins Park Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 25 judges on record at this office since 2016, 11 of whom reported in SSA's latest period. Because approval rates across this bench range from 33% to 82%, it is important to understand the landscape of the office where your hearing will take place.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions