SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Melinda Yurich

Last decided San FranciscoJul 2026
Decisions 898since 2023

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. While your judge's overall approval rate on record since 2023 is 28%, her latest-period approval rate is 26%. This latest figure sits 20 percentage points below the San Francisco office's latest-period average of 46%. These metrics are derived from a docket of 898 decisions, providing a stable basis for analysis.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2023
Approval rate 28%
Decisions on record 898
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Yurich San Francisco National
Approval rate 26% 46% 58%
Fully favorable 19% — —
Denials 74% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Yurich's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Yurich
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY24FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since October 2023, the approval rate for Melinda Yurich has shown variation across 898 decisions on record. The yearly trend saw an approval rate of 38% in 2024, followed by 23% in 2025, and 26% during the partial 2026 fiscal year. This pattern indicates a shift in outcomes compared to the initial period on record, reflecting a stabilization following the decline observed in 2025.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Yurich's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the San Francisco hearing office

The San Francisco Hearing Office serves claimants across California and is part of a regional network of SSA offices. There are 10 judges whose most recent office on record is this location, which maintained a 46% approval rate during the latest reporting period. You can expect a formal hearing process where your evidence quality is the primary factor in your decision.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is San Francisco

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 10 judges whose most recent office on record is the San Francisco Hearing Office, and 5 of them decided cases here in SSA's latest file through July 2026. Approval rates for this bench range from 28% to 65% on their records.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions