SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Marilyn D. Zahm

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Buffalo Hearing Office · 4 years on the bench · 840 lifetime decisions

Check My Benefits →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge Zahm's approval rate is measured against the broader context of the Buffalo Hearing Office and national standards. While the office maintains a recent approval rate of 53%, Judge Zahm's recent performance has trended lower, currently sitting 13 percentage points below the national average. These metrics are derived from a docket of 840 lifetime decisions, providing a view of her decision-making history. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Zahm Buffalo National
Approval rate 45% 53% 58%
Fully favorable 38%
Denials 55%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Zahm's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Zahm
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY19
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over her 4 years on the bench, Judge Zahm's approval rate has shown a downward trend. Starting at 62% in 2016, the rate shifted to 51% in 2017, before moving to 35% in 2018 and 36% in 2019. This pattern reflects the evolution of the cases and evidence presented in her courtroom over time.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Zahm's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Zahm? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Check My Benefits
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Buffalo hearing office

The Buffalo Hearing Office serves a large population across New York, managing a volume of disability claims with a bench of 6 judges. The office maintains a recent approval rate of 53%, which serves as a benchmark for the region. You should be prepared for a review of your medical records and vocational history when appearing at this office. You can find more information on the Buffalo Hearing Office page.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases to judges using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment is essentially random. Within the Buffalo Hearing Office, the bench consists of 6 judges with lifetime approval rates ranging from 45% to 54%. Because you cannot choose your judge, it is important to focus on the strength of your medical evidence. The guidance for your preparation remains consistent regardless of which judge is assigned to your case.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Check My Benefits

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions