SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Marilyn D. Zahm

Last decided BuffaloSep 2019
Decisions 129since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Evaluating your judge's history requires looking at the broader context of their peers. The 51% approval rate for Marilyn D. Zahm is based on 129 decisions on record since 2016, which compares to the 28% to 89% range observed among the 18 judges whose most recent office on record is the Buffalo hearing office. This data provides a statistical baseline for understanding how different adjudicators have approached similar cases.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 51%
Decisions on record 129

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Zahm. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 27, 2019. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Zahm's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Zahm
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY19
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Marilyn D. Zahm shows a shift across the 129 decisions on record since 2016. After an initial period of higher approval rates in 2016 and 2017, the data indicates a decline in the subsequent two years. This trend reflects a change in the outcomes of cases decided during that window, which often relates to shifts in the evidence or the specific mix of cases presented.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Zahm's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Buffalo hearing office

Marilyn D. Zahm's most recent office on record is the Buffalo hearing office. This office is part of a regional network that handles a high volume of disability claims. With 18 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, the bench represents a wide spectrum of decision-making patterns.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Buffalo

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 18 judges whose most recent office on record is the Buffalo hearing office, with approval rates ranging from 28% to 89% on their since-2016 records. Because assignment is outside of your control, focusing on the strength of your medical evidence is the most effective way to prepare.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions