SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Barbara J. Zanotti

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 3,434 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The approval rates for Barbara J. Zanotti reflect a consistent volume of cases handled at the Tampa OHO. When comparing her performance to the broader bench, note that the office-wide lifetime approval-rate range spans from 31% to 90%. These figures are based on a substantial docket of 3,434 lifetime decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 57%
Decisions on record 3,434
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Zanotti Tampa OHO National
Approval rate 62% 59% 58%
Fully favorable 54%
Denials 38%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Zanotti's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Zanotti
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the approval rate for Barbara J. Zanotti has shown a gradual upward trend, moving from 41% in her early recorded years to a more recent period rate of 62%. This shift reflects a period of steady activity across 3,434 lifetime decisions. While the latest period shows a slight variance from the lifetime average, the overall pattern suggests a consistent approach to case evaluation.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Zanotti's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Tampa OHO hearing office

The Tampa OHO serves you across the Florida region, managing a diverse caseload with a bench of 16 judges on record. The office maintains a latest-period approval rate of 59%, which provides a baseline for the local hearing environment. You can expect a formal administrative process focused on medical evidence and vocational testimony. For more information, see the Tampa OHO Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Tampa OHO utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your judge assignment is essentially random. There are 16 judges on record at this office since 2016, 11 of whom reported in the SSA's latest period. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 31% to 90% over their respective lifetimes. You can find more information on the Tampa OHO Hearing Office page.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions