SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Sharon Zanotto

Last decided HarrisburgSep 2024
Decisions 1,732since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at the same data windows to ensure accuracy. The 47% approval rate for Sharon Zanotto reflects all decisions on record since 2016, which can be measured against the 17% to 86% range observed among the bench at the Harrisburg office. With 1,732 decisions on record, the data provides a look at past trends. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 47%
Decisions on record 1,732

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Zanotto. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 27, 2024. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Zanotto's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Zanotto
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY24
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Sharon Zanotto has shown a downward trend since 2016. After reaching a high of 61% in 2017, the annual approval rate gradually declined, reaching 33% in the 2024 data. This pattern is based on 1,732 total decisions on record. The recent shift in the approval rate may reflect changes in case mix or the specific evidence presented in your hearings.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Zanotto's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Harrisburg hearing office

The Harrisburg Hearing Office serves you if you are in the region and is part of the broader SSA network. This office includes 13 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. You can expect a standard administrative hearing process where the quality of your medical evidence remains the primary factor in a decision. You can see the Harrisburg Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Harrisburg

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 13 judges whose most recent office on record is the Harrisburg Hearing Office. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 17% to 86% since 2016. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions