Janet L. Alaga-Gadigian has a lifetime approval rate of 69% across 3,696 decisions since 2016 at the Oak Park hearing office. While this rate provides a helpful baseline, your specific medical evidence remains the most critical factor in your claim. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings. An attorney can help you prepare your case for this specific judge.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
The approval rates for Janet L. Alaga-Gadigian reflect a consistent history of decision-making at the Oak Park office. Her lifetime approval rate of 69% sits within the office-wide range of 36% to 83% for all judges on record. In the most recent reporting period, her 80% approval rate compares favorably to the office rate of 66%, the state rate of 60%, and the national rate of 58%. These figures represent historical trends rather than future outcomes.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Alaga-Gadigian's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Since 2016, the decision pattern for Janet L. Alaga-Gadigian has shown variability. After starting with a 66% approval rate, her yearly figures have fluctuated, reaching 80% in the 2026 reporting period. With 3,696 total decisions on record, the data shows a trend toward higher approval rates in recent years, particularly since 2024.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Alaga-Gadigian's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
Reading this because a claim was denied? Decode the letter — what the sentence means, what to file, and by when.
About the Oak Park hearing office
The Oak Park hearing office serves claimants throughout the region and maintains a bench of 20 judges on record. The office-wide latest-period approval rate is 66%, providing a local benchmark for your claim. You can expect a standard administrative hearing process focused on medical evidence and vocational testimony. You can visit the Oak Park hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.
Other judges at this hearing office
The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. There are 20 judges on record at this office since 2016, 10 of whom reported in the latest period, with lifetime approval rates ranging from 36% to 83%. Because each judge brings a unique approach to the bench, understanding the office-wide environment is helpful for your preparation.
Approval rates change with a lawyer
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
Frequently asked questions
Janet L. Alaga-Gadigian has a lifetime approval rate of 69%, which falls within the 36% to 83% range seen across the Oak Park bench. In the most recent reporting period, her 80% approval rate is 14 points higher than the office average of 66%. An attorney can help you understand how these trends might relate to your specific medical evidence.
Yes, the approval rate for Janet L. Alaga-Gadigian has fluctuated over her 3,696 decisions since 2016. While she began with a 66% approval rate, recent data shows an increase to 80% in the latest reporting period. An attorney can help you analyze these trends to better prepare for your hearing.
No, you cannot request a specific judge. The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases randomly to ensure efficiency. Regardless of your assignment, an attorney can help you prepare your case for the specific requirements of the hearing office.
An SSDI hearing is a formal but non-adversarial proceeding where a judge reviews your medical records and hears testimony. You may be questioned by the judge or a vocational expert about your ability to perform work tasks. An attorney can help you prepare for these questions and ensure your evidence is clearly presented.
A judge's approval rate is a reflection of past decisions and not a prediction of your specific outcome. While Janet L. Alaga-Gadigian has a lifetime approval rate of 69%, the strength of your medical documentation is the most important factor in your claim. An attorney can help you build a case that addresses the specific standards of your judge.



