SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Janet L. Alaga-Gadigian

Last decided Oak ParkJul 2026
Decisions 3,696since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Over the 12 months to July 31, 2026, the 76% approval rate for Janet L. Alaga-Gadigian compares to an office rate of 66%, a state rate of 60%, and a national rate of 58%. These figures reflect the judge's recent activity at the Oak Park Hearing Office.

Last 12 months July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Alaga-Gadigian Oak Park National
Approval rate 76% 66% 58%
Fully favorable 66% — —
Denials 24% — —
Decisions 205 — —
All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 69%
Decisions on record 3,696

SSA publishes no office- or national-level breakdown of fully favorable and denial rates. The 12 months are SSA's figures for this fiscal year to date plus the rest of the previous fiscal year; how we calculate them.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Alaga-Gadigian's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Alaga-Gadigian
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Janet L. Alaga-Gadigian has issued 3,696 decisions. Her annual approval rates have varied, with 66% in 2016, 75% in 2017, 67% in 2018, 62% in 2019, 67% in 2020, 67% in 2021, 68% in 2022, 72% in 2023, 71% in 2024, 76% in 2025, and 80% in 2026.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Alaga-Gadigian's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Oak Park hearing office

The Oak Park Hearing Office is the most recent office on record for Janet L. Alaga-Gadigian as of July 2026. The office bench consists of 9 judges who decided cases in SSA's latest file, with an approval rate range of 40% to 86% over the 12 months to July 31, 2026.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Oak Park

The 9 judges who decided cases at the Oak Park Hearing Office in SSA's latest file range from 40% to 86% in approval rates over the 12 months to July 31, 2026.

Judges with similar approval rates

These active judges' approval rates over the same 12 months (July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026) are closest to Judge Alaga-Gadigian's 76%. Three of them last decided cases in Michigan. With too few close matches there, the rest come from SSA's Chicago region.

Rates within 5 points of each other are hard to tell apart at a typical caseload, so treat these as judges with comparable records, not a ranking. See Judge Alaga-Gadigian and the three closest side by side →

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions